<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A little QTP performance test: Object Repository vs. Descriptive Programming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://automation-beyond.com/2010/03/18/qtp-performance-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://automation-beyond.com/2010/03/18/qtp-performance-test/</link>
	<description>An engineering approach to Software Testing and Test Automation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 06:01:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick questions &#8211; quick answers - Automation Beyond</title>
		<link>http://automation-beyond.com/2010/03/18/qtp-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick questions &#8211; quick answers - Automation Beyond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://automation-beyond.com/?p=2027#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>[...] Use methods of RepositoriesCollection object: Find / Add / Remove. See sample code. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Use methods of RepositoriesCollection object: Find / Add / Remove. See sample code. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://automation-beyond.com/2010/03/18/qtp-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://automation-beyond.com/?p=2027#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>Wow. I never wanted to use so much hardcodings in QTP scripts. Now I&#039;m armed to argue about this question at work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I never wanted to use so much hardcodings in QTP scripts. Now I&#8217;m armed to argue about this question at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://automation-beyond.com/2010/03/18/qtp-performance-test/comment-page-1/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://automation-beyond.com/?p=2027#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Hi Albert,

If I decided to go with QTP Actions and not functions what is the best way to pass parameters while calling them?

Thanks,
Jim

&lt;i&gt;[ Albert&#039;s Reply.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Hi Jim, &lt;/i&gt;
&lt;i&gt;You can use &lt;strong&gt;Parameter&lt;/strong&gt; built-in object for primary arguments, &lt;strong&gt;Environment&lt;/strong&gt; built-in object for configuration data, and &lt;strong&gt;Datatable&lt;/strong&gt; built-in object for Test Case data. ]&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Albert,</p>
<p>If I decided to go with QTP Actions and not functions what is the best way to pass parameters while calling them?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jim</p>
<p><i>[ Albert's Reply.</i></p>
<p><i>Hi Jim, </i><br />
<i>You can use <strong>Parameter</strong> built-in object for primary arguments, <strong>Environment</strong> built-in object for configuration data, and <strong>Datatable</strong> built-in object for Test Case data. ]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

